President Barack Obama is urging his successor, Donald Trump, to maintain the newly established U.S. working relationship with Cuba, according to Reuters News Agency.
Trump, who takes office in about a month, has promised to scrap Obama’s executive orders that re-establish diplomatic relations and relax travel and trade restrictions, unless Cuba agrees to “make a better deal.”
The uncertainty raises new questions about the future of U.S.-Cuba relations and about the communist nation itself.
Alexander Aviña
ASU history professor Alexander Aviña has studied Cuba through his focus on Cold War Latin America and revolutionary social movements. He provides a glimpse into the history and possible future in this Q&A with ASU Now.
Question: Do you predict any changes within Cuba immediately? In the future?
Answer: I do not foresee any immediate changes in Cuba, other than the possible derailment of the diplomatic and economic openings initiated by Barack Obama and Raul Castro.
Since Raul Castro became president in 2006, he has slowly and gradually allowed for limited market reforms and begun negotiating the normalization of diplomatic relations with the United States.
In addition to reforms like the legalizing of some small businesses or the cutting of government employment opportunities, the transfer of political power to a younger generation of Cuban leaders constitutes the other main issue for the near future: What happens when there is a generational transfer?
Since I firmly believe in the ideals of national sovereignty, self-determination and anti-imperialism, I hope the Cuban people themselves will decide the fate of their island without outside interference.
Q: Cuba had been a capitalist nation. Could it go back? Could it become a democracy?
A: One could make the argument that the sort of capitalism that existed in Cuba from 1898 to the 1950s — an export-based economy based on the production of a single commodity (sugar) — created the sort of social and economic inequalities (not to mention the political corruption it incentivized) that fueled the revolution that brought Fidel Castro to power.
Genuine democracy would depend on a long series of seemingly disparate but connected popular struggles to organize, mobilize and even sacrifice their lives for things like labor rights, citizenship rights, etc.
As such, democracy that opens up the political system beyond the monopoly of the Communist Party of Cuba may occur in the future. Hopefully, that would be the result of Cuban popular struggles and initiative and not outside interference.
Q: What do you expect will come next for Cuban-American relations?
A: I hope that the diplomatic thaw and opening that publicly began in December 2014 continues unabated — and in a way that respects Cuban national sovereignty and self-determination.
Five decades of U.S. covert military aggression, diplomatic isolation and economic embargoes has only worked to punitively punish everyday Cubans and paradoxically strengthened the political position of leaders like the Castro brothers who needed American aggression to justify their political and socio-economic models.
The election of Donald Trump, though, threatens the progress made and portends a bleak future for Cuban-U.S. relations if we take his campaign promises seriously.
Q: What impact do Cuban-American voters have on negotiations between the U.S. and Cuba?
A: Since the early 1960s up to the early 2000s, Cuban-American voters — generally right-wing and Republican-voting — wielded much influence.
They became a formidable, concentrated voting bloc in Florida, a large-population state, despite the fact that they only make up 3.7 percent of the national Latino American population.
Yet, Florida’s Cuban-American population has experienced important generational shifts, as younger Cuban-Americans and more recent Cuban immigrant arrivals tend not to fully embrace the hard-line views of older members of their communities.
Younger Cuban-Americans are also increasingly joining the Democratic Party. In my own experience teaching Cuban-American students in Florida, the vast majority vehemently criticized and opposed the Cuban political system, while also generally favoring improved and open diplomatic relations between the two countries.
Top photo by Richard Hewitt
More Law, journalism and politics
Cronkite School launches Women Leaders in Sports Media live-learn program
Women in a new sports media program at Arizona State University got a solid game plan from a sports veteran at an Aug. 20 welcome event.“Be humble, be consistent and be a solver,” Charli Turner…
ASU center to host the Pursuits of Education and Excellence Symposium
The Center for the Study of Race and Democracy (CSRD) at Arizona State University is introducing the Pursuits of Education and Excellence Symposium as part of an ongoing initiative to commemorate the…
ASU journalism students dominate NATAS Student Production Award nominations
Students at Arizona State University’s Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication dominated the nominations field of the prestigious Rocky Mountain Southwest Chapter of the National…