ASU’s Center for Advanced Studies in Global Education has helped organize a conference aimed at finding new metrics to address a UN goal of improving education worldwide.
“Globally, we made an agreement that we should measure not only access but also the quality of education we provide,” said Iveta Silova, a professor and director of the center, part of the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University. “But we don’t have an agreement on how it should be measured.
“How can we measure learning beyond literacy and numeracy? And how can we capture important issues like being a good citizen or human rights or morality?”
With the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals in mind, Silova’s center and the Comparative and International Education Society have partnered to host a symposium in Scottsdale this week on global learning metrics.
The event will bring together experts in policy and practical applications from all over the world, including Silvia Montoya, director of the UNESCO Institute for Statistics, and Pasi Sahlberg, a Finnish educator, scholar and authorSahlberg is author of the best-selling book “Finnish Lessons 2.0: What Can the World Learn From Educational Change in Finland.”.
Silova, who has many years of working for non-government organizations in Central Asia, took over the Center for Advanced Studies in Global Education at ASU earlier this year. She talked about the center’s mission and the upcoming event.
Question: How did you become interested in global education?
Answer: I was born and raised in Latvia, and all of my education was during the Soviet period. As I was finishing high school, the Soviet Union collapsed. The transition was very chaotic, and there were a lot of things that didn’t make sense.
Iveta Silova
One of the most shocking things was that as we were preparing for our high school graduation exams, at the last moment, the history exam was canceled. It was because everyone knew that the history we had learned for the last 10 years in school was wrong, and the new textbooks literally hadn’t been written yet.
One of the reasons I ended up studying education is that there were so many changes and so rapidly and so many did not make sense that for personal reasons I was driven to the fieldSilova earned master’s and doctorate degrees from Columbia University’s Teachers College. of education to try to make sense.
Q: What happened to education after the fall of the Soviet Union?
A: I worked for the Soros Foundation in Latvia, which was a leader of education reform. At one point, an international team came to interview people, including me, and to look at statistics and write their assessment report. They basically wrote that Latvia lacked local capacity and education policy. To me, that was shocking because the people I was working with were incredibly qualified.
I later realized it was more about power dynamics globally that designate some people as experts, displacing local expertise.
When international people talked about education reform in the former Soviet Union, the main argument was usually that you would negate everything and start over.
But this is not what people on the ground locally believed. In central Asia, the Soviets were the ones made education accessible to everybody. But you couldn’t say that to the international donor community.
In Azerbaijan, entire classrooms would be empty because everyone — the students and the teachers — would be doing private tutoring on the side.
Q: What’s ahead for the Center for Advanced Studies in Global Education?
A: We’re working on multiple fronts.
We have mobilized faculty to see who is doing international work. We have about 30 affiliated faculty at the center, with so much more international experience than we ever thought.
We found out that we have will have another U.S. State Department grant for the International Leaders in Education Program, so 60 teachers from other countries will come to ASU in the spring.
One of the big pieces we’re discussing is how teachers in Arizona need to be better versed in how globalization affects schools here, whether it’s in terms of refugees or undocumented immigrants or just the changing environment. How are we preparing teachers to face these issues? We want to think about how to engage with that.
Q: Why is the symposium on global metrics important?
A: The symposium is bringing together people with different perspectives from policy and the research and practical worlds to discuss this issue.
Now, most of the conversation on assessments is driven by large-scale data sets. But others are talking about how we can bring small data into the conversation?
Another big question we’ll discuss is how can we make these global learning metrics culturally sensitive? How do we avoid being Western-centric and measuring everything by our own standards?
We’ll have some of the key people that are thinking and talking about global learning metrics, but might not always come together to further the conversation. And hopefully we’ll provide that space.
For information on the symposium, to be held Thursday and Friday at the Doubletree Resort in Scottsdale, click here.
More Law, journalism and politics
New online certificate prepares grad students for complex challenges of US democracy
If United States politics in the 2020s have revealed anything so far, it’s that the U.S. has a complex history with ramifications that still powerfully resound today. In order to help students…
Reporting live from Paris: ASU journalism students to cover Olympic Games
To hear the word Paris is to think of picnics at the base of the Eiffel Tower, long afternoons spent in the Louvre and boat rides on the Seine. Competitive sports aren’t normally top of mind.However…
Exploring the intersection of law and technology
Editor's note: This expert Q&A is part of our “AI is everywhere ... now what?” special project exploring the potential (and potential pitfalls) of artificial intelligence in our lives. Explore…