For all its benefits, social media is an environment that remains rife with judgement, especially if you're a public figure, and — according to an Arizona State University student's recent research — especially if you're a woman.
Lydia Dawson, a senior at ASU's School of Politics and Global Studies, recently conducted an experiment that found female politicians were more harshly judged overall for negative Instagram comments.
Dawson's experiment served as the basis for her thesis for Barrett, The Honors College. She was recently selected to present it at The National Conference on Undergraduate Research in Long Beach, California, in April.
Dawson's idea began in Gina Woodall’s POS 435: Women and Politics class.
“I took Dr. Woodall's Women and Politics class in the fall of 2022 and absolutely loved it, so when I was considering thesis ideas in the spring of 2023, I knew I wanted to explore themes related to gender and politics," she said.
Dawson’s thesis explores how politicians are treated over Instagram comments and how this impacts voters' perceptions of them, with a particular focus on the gendered aspect of this.
“I initially approached Dr. Woodall with the idea of performing a content analysis of Instagram comments to examine if there was any difference in the types (negative/positive) of comments male and female politicians received,” Dawson said. “After she mentioned the possibility of applying for lab space, we discussed running an experiment to test how negative Instagram comments alter voters' perceptions of politicians, and whether or not this differed based on the politician's gender.”
The experiment separated the participants into four groups, assigned them each to either a female or male politician, and showed them each the same hypothetical politician’s profile with the only difference being the name and gender on it. They were then told to evaluate the politician on six different metrics. The experimental group was then shown negative Instagram comments that had been attributed to their assigned politician and were asked to evaluate the politician a second time.
“I was shocked to find that the female politician received higher scores on all six metrics both before and after the presentation of the comments, as literature in this field has shown that female candidates typically score lower than male candidates on the metrics I presented,” Dawson said.
She noted that there were many interesting results, most of which were less positive for female politicians.
Dawson's experiment showed that while the female politician scored higher both before and after the stimulus was presented overall, the female politician’s scores were more harshly affected than her male counterpart.
Aside from some interesting findings, Dawson's thesis has also led to her deciding to pursue a PhD in political science with an emphasis on gender and politics, rather than becoming a lawyer like she had initially planned, due to her newly found love of research.
More Law, journalism and politics
Exhibit uses rare memorabilia to illustrate evolution of US presidential campaigns
After one of the most contentious elections in history, a new museum exhibit offers a historical perspective on the centuries-old American process.“We The People! Electing the American President” had…
TechTainment conference explores the crossroads of law, technology, entertainment
What protections do writers, actors, producers and others have from AI? Will changing laws around name, image and likeness (NIL) eliminate less lucrative college sports programs?And what does…
How to watch an election
Every election night, adrenaline pumps through newsrooms across the country as journalists take the pulse of democracy. We gathered three veteran reporters — each of them faculty at the Walter…