9 out of 10 scientists in ASU survey say they have role in reducing public vaccine hesitancy

Similar numbers say deliberately published false information is main reason for public confusion about vaccinations


Bottles on a table labeled "Covid-19 Coronavirus Vaccine."

Photo courtesy Pixabay

|

Nine out of 10 U.S. academic scientists surveyed believe scientists have a part to play in reducing vaccine hesitancy among the public, a research team from Arizona State University’s Center for Science, Technology and Environment Policy Studies (CSTEPS) has found.

In addition, nearly nine in 10 said they believe deliberate dissemination of false information is a major source of public confusion about receiving vaccinations.

CSTEPS’ science communication platform, SciOPS (Scientist Opinion Panel Survey), recently reported results of the survey, which tabulated responses from 316 U.S. academics in science provided between April 4 and May 1. SciOPS researches opinions of thousands of experts in science, technology and innovation.

Findings were published in a research article titled “How Scientists View Vaccine Hesitancy.”

CSTEPS Director Eric Welch of ASU’s School of Public Affairs led a team of researchers from ASU and the University of Illinois, Chicago, in producing the three-section survey. Results were released in July. The first section regards vaccination policies, the second discusses the role of science and risk communication about vaccines, and the third details scientists’ views on reasons for declining vaccination rates and public confusion.

Welch said while many op-eds and interviews with scientists about vaccines have been posted, this study uniquely provides the aggregated opinions of hundreds of biology and public health experts.

“This allows us to better see the areas of consensus and controversy,” Welch said. “The results from our survey highlight that there are a diversity of opinions within the scientific community regarding how to improve science-society communication, including the need to be transparent and candid to the public about the risk of vaccines and their research.”

Biologists comprise 69.4% of the survey sample, while public health experts comprise 30.2%. The survey has a margin of error of plus-or-minus five percentage points.

Key findings of the survey include:

  • 91% of the sample said they believe scientists have a role in reducing vaccine hesitancy among the public.
  • A majority responded that lack of public trust in the U.S. government (73%) and in pharmaceutical companies (54%) are major reasons for declining vaccination coverage.
  • A majority believe it is always ethical to communicate information about vaccines that has verifiable peer-reviewed scientific support (82%) and is fully transparent about scientific uncertainties (74%).
  • Most believe deliberate dissemination of false information (87%) and lack of public understanding (70%) are the major sources of public confusion.
  • About half (52%) of the respondents think entering into direct dialogue with the public is the most effective way for scientists to help reduce vaccine hesitancy.

The School of Public Affairs is part of the Watts College of Public Service and Community Solutions.

More Science and technology

 

Galaxy PJ0116-24, known as an Einstein ring

Telescopes in Atacama Desert capture extreme starburst galaxy warped into fiery ring

Ten billion years in the past, a rare population of extreme galaxies formed stars at rates more than 1,000 times faster than our…

Graphic illustration of daphnia, a form of zooplankton.

Study challenges traditional views of evolution

In new research, Arizona State University scientists and their colleagues investigated genetic changes occurring in a naturally…

A studio portrait of Kyle Jensen, wearing a white shirt on a dark background lit with orange lighting

Understanding how our perception of AI affects its use

Editor's note: This expert Q&A is part of our “AI is everywhere ... now what?” special project exploring the potential (and…