image title

New urine color chart makes self-assessing hydration easier

May 7, 2021

ASU College of Health Solutions studies provide insight, advancements in determining hydration levels

In the late 1980s, University of Connecticut researcher Lawrence E. Armstrong was looking for a way to assess hydration. In his lab, he had laid out several urine samples for analysis when the light coming in the window passed through the containers, casting patches of varying colors on the table.

Realizing the intensity of the colors corresponded to the samples’ concentration, he arranged them in order from light to dark. Thus was born the original eight-color urine color chart, with the lightest color representing optimal hydration.

For decades, the chart has been used in locker rooms around the globe to give athletes a quick and easy way to self-assess their hydration level by comparing their urine sample to the colors on the chart, without the need for a trained investigator with special equipment. However, in the years that have passed since the original chart began circulating, derivatives of it have resulted in charts with skewed colors and questionable accuracy.

ASU College of Health Solutions Assistant Professor of nutrition Floris Wardenaar saw an opportunity and worked with his colleagues to develop a new, multi-shade urine color chart.

two urine color charts side by side, the one on the left depicting eight colors and the one on the right depicting seven colors, each color indicating a different level of hydration

Figure F (left) represents the chart adapted from Armstrong’s original while figure G (right) represents the chart developed by Wardenaar and his team. Photo courtesy of Floris Wardenaar

In two recently published studies, Wardenaar and his team compared their newly designed chart with one adapted from Armstrong’s original, and also tested the accuracy of a separate chart Wardenaar developed that takes into account the length of voiding time and the dilution of urine color caused by water in the toilet bowl.

Wardenaar found only a slight difference in accuracy between the two commonly used multiple-shade charts, meaning athletes can still use Armstrong’s original chart and subsequent derivatives of it to assess hydration and expect fairly reliable results. He also found that the chart he has developed is comparably accurate to Armstrong’s original, meaning athletes can now use his new chart with the added benefit of being able to self-assess their hydration level “at-the-toilet-bowl,” without the hassle of using a cup to collect their urine sample.

“I think the main conclusion is that there is not a lot of difference between the charts, so if you have a well-prepared urine color chart, it probably doesn't really matter which one you use, but you should be aware that there are some limitations,” Wardenaar said.

To test the accuracy of the charts derived from Armstrong’s original, Wardenaar and his team asked 189 participants to self-assess their hydration using both. The researchers then compared participants’ self-assessments to the results of a urine specific gravity testA urine specific gravity test is a laboratory test that health care providers use to check the density of patients’ urine to assess health and test for abnormalities. to determine their diagnostic accuracy.

Both charts scored about 77% accuracy compared with the results of the urine specific gravity test.

To test the accuracy of his own chart, Wardenaar and his team asked the same group of participants to self-assess their hydration level at the toilet bowl using his chart, which depicts three color panels, each representing the color of urine at optimal hydration level for a voiding duration of one to eight seconds, nine to 16 seconds and 17 or more seconds.

urine shade chart with three separate color panels, each depicting the optimal hydration color for a specified voiding duration

Using this three-panel urine color chart, participants selected a panel based on the length of voiding duration, then determined whether their urine sample was lighter or darker than the color depicted in that panel. Photo courtesy of Floris Wardenaar

Using this method, participants selected a color panel based not on the color of their urine, but on the length of their voiding time. Then they determined whether their own urine color in the toilet bowl was lighter or darker than the color in the panel they chose. If their urine was darker than the color in the panel that corresponded to their voiding duration time, they were likely underhydrated. If it was the same, they were likely well-hydrated, and if it was lighter, they were likely hypohydrated.

Trained investigators then made their own assessment of the urine samples using the same chart, and participants’ self-assessments were then compared to investigators’ assessments. In the end, urine color was scored similarly by subjects and investigators. Compared with the results of a urine specific gravity test, participants correctly classified their hydration level with about 72% accuracy, and investigators with about 75% accuracy.

Wardenaar said these results show that his new, three-panel lavatory urine color chart gives results similar to those of traditional urine color charts, but with the advantage of a more immediate assessment of hydration status because it can be done directly at the toilet bowl, making the method more applicable for the larger population.

Top photo courtesy of Pixabay

Emma Greguska

Reporter , ASU News

(480) 965-9657

 
image title

Quick recovery after recession leads to promising economic outlook for state

Income inequality could be a drag on a strong economy, ASU experts say.
May 7, 2021

ASU experts see optimism and, despite increased costs, no housing 'bubble' in Arizona

The economic outlook for Arizona and the U.S. is promising as the deep recession sparked by the pandemic quickly recedes, according to three Arizona State University experts.

“A year ago, we were wondering how deep it would be and how long it would last,” Dennis Hoffman said of the economic downturn brought on by COVID-19.

“Now we know: It was very deep but it was very short-lived."

Hoffman, director of the L. William Seidman Research Institute in the W. P. Carey School of Business, spoke at the annual economic forecast event held by the Economic Club of Phoenix, a unit of the W. P. Carey School. The panel discussion was held online Thursday.

The federal government’s economic stimulus checks are a big factor in the recovery, Hoffman said.

“The stimulus data are amazing. Without a stimulus, there would be a deep decline,” he said. “But the forecasters are clear: It’s onward and upward from here. There’s not a lot of debate around that.”

However, Hoffman noted that the recovery has not been equal for everyone.

“During the recovery, the folks making $60,000 or more had a blip and are now back to normal, but for those making $27,000, they are still well below where they were before the pandemic,” Hoffman said.

Dennis Hoffman, professor of economics and director of the L. William Seidman Research Institute at ASU, showed a slide that illustrated how the pandemic recovery has exacerbated income inequality. People earning $60,000 or more are doing as well as before the pandemic, while those who earn $27,000 or less are faring much worse. Screenshot by Charlie Leight/ASU News

 

Hoffman said that some are worried about inflation.

“Many companies are planning to raise prices. Food prices are up. Transportation costs are up. Lumber prices are through the roof,” he said.

“The Fed sees only a temporary price pressure, but no ongoing inflation.”

A quick recovery for Phoenix and the state

The outlook for Arizona and the Phoenix metro region also is good, according to Lee McPheters, research professor of economics in the W. P. Carey School of Business and director of the school’s JPMorgan Chase Economic Outlook Center.

“Arizona went into the pandemic with a rip-roaring economy. We were No. 1 in the country in the rate of job creation,” he said.

“We expect over 115,000 jobs to be added this year, which will replace all the jobs that were lost by the end of 2021.”

He compared the pandemic recession to the Great Recession of 2007–10.

“The Great Recession lost over 300,000 jobs in three years and took five years to recover them,” he said.

The current recession started in April 2020.

“We lost over 331,000 jobs, more than the Great Recession, but we’ve already recovered over two-thirds,” he said.

A screenshot of a Zoom presentation where a man explains a graphic about Arizona regaining lost jobs

Lee McPheters, research professor of economics and director of the JPMorgan Chase Economic Outlook Center at ASU, showed a slide illustrating the slow recovery from the Great Recession and the deep but brief recession sparked by the COVID-19 pandemic. Screenshot by Charlie Leight/ASU News

Arizona has always depended on migration to the state to drive economic development, McPheters said.

Analysts were shocked when the recent census results showed that Arizona added 774,000 people over the previous decade, and not the million new residents that were expected.

“The big issue for economists is that a lot of government money is distributed on a per-capita basis, and those dollars won’t be going to Arizona,” he said.

While in previous years, construction was the No. 1 growth industry in the Phoenix metro area, right now it’s transportation and warehousing.

“Over 60 million square feet of industrial space is under construction,” he said. “Amazon has signed 11 leases last year alone.”

One exception to the bright outlook is for small businesses, about 30% of which remain closed, McPheters said.

With real estate, experts are now starting to realize which changes wrought by the pandemic will last, according to Mark Stapp, the Fred E. Taylor Professor of Real Estate in W. P. Carey. Among those:

  • Retail was already being reimagined, but those changes are occurring more rapidly, such as a focus on “experiential retail” and health and wellness. “Retailers want to change what they’re using the brick-and-mortar spaces for, and that will change the value proposition for those spaces.”
  • The “work from anywhere” movement is here to stay. “The cost of making office spaces comfortable for employees to return is having a big impact on net operating income and affecting the value of the spaces as well.”
  • Industrial spaces are thriving. “For fulfillment and logistics, we are the place to be.”

Mark Stapp, the Fred E. Taylor Professor in Real Estate at ASU, showed a slide illustrating the results of a recent survey of commercial real estate agents, showing that 96% are optimistic about the market in Phoenix. Screenshot by Charlie Leight/ASU News

Is there a housing bubble?

ASU’s experts say that there is no housing “bubble” that could burst, leading to an economic freefall like the one in the previous decade.

McPheters said that economic development depends on the supply and affordability of housing.

“Home prices are up about 24% over a year ago,” he said.

But compared with California and other places that people are leaving to move to Arizona, the local housing is affordable.

“Even though home prices are up, incomes also are up and mortgage rates are down, so mortgage payments are not in the ‘bubble’ territory yet,” McPheters said.

Stapp said that there are simply not enough houses because the market was underbuilt over the previous decade, while the population was growing.

“We have a supply problem, and that’s not easy to fix,” he said.

“From 2011 onward, it was consuming overbuilt inventory. By 2015, we had consumed most of that and continued to build at very low rates,” Stapp said.

“It’s not a problem as long as we have better wage-earning jobs moving here and as long as interest rates stay low.”

But income inequality could be a risk factor.

“The social concern is that there are winners and losers, and we have to focus on the losers just as much as the winners,” he said.

“It will create a drag on the economy if we don’t pay close attention to it.”

Top photo of downtown Phoenix by Deanna Dent/ASU News

Mary Beth Faller

Reporter , ASU News

480-727-4503