image title

What parents want for their children’s education

April 8, 2021

ASU president addressed more than 500 educators to discuss parents' hopes for their children's college education and pathways to work

Obtaining a college degree is a wonderful achievement and a life-changing event, but parents want more for their children than just landing a well-paying job, Arizona State University President Michael M. Crow said April 7 in a nationally attended livestream event for educators and policymakers.

“I have three children and five grandchildren and my wife would agree with me that I want them to have no limits to their opportunity. And I want them to not have gone through some of the stuff I’ve gone through,” Crow said, addressing a group of approximately 500 academics; federal, state and local policymakers; members of education NGOs and think tanks; and a variety of working professionals. “Parents want their children to be economically successful and they want their children to have a good life. That’s what they really want.”

Crow was the featured guest speaker in a virtual event titled “Family Voices: Building Pathways From Learning to Meaningful Work,” hosted by the Carnegie Corporation of New York and Gallup. The one-hour web discussion explored the Carnegie Corporation of New York’s Family Voice study and the core issues of pathways, barriers to aspirations and what parents want their children's postsecondary education to include.

The event panel also included Aimée Eubanks Davis, founder and CEO of Braven; LaVerne Evans Srinivasan, vice president of the National Program and program director of education for Carnegie Corporation of New York; and John White, co-founder and board chair of Propel America and former Louisiana state superintendent of education. Mohamed Younis, editor-in-chief for Gallup, handled facilitating duties.

Man in his office

President Michael Crow speaks with Mohamed Younis, editor-in-chief at Gallup, about research on American parents and their educational/vocational aspirations for their high-school students, in a webcast discussion, Wednesday, April 7, 2021, titled “Family Voices: Building Pathways From Learning to Meaningful Work.” 

The presentation started with the results of a recent Carnegie Corporation of New York/Gallup public opinon poll of approximately 3,000 parents who were interviewed Nov. 8–Dec. 9, 2020. They were asked what they most hoped their child would do when they graduated from high school.

Younis said based on the results, parents can be divided into two fairly equal-size groups: Those who said they want their child to attend a four-year college, and those who would prefer their child do something else, such as learning a trade or joining the military. Mostly, they wanted to see more postsecondary options available to their child as well as increased opportunities to connect learning and work.

Crow believes much of the problem has to do with education itself and that the country’s university model needs to be as “democratically driven as possible.”

“It should set a standard for admission that’s related to the actual qualifications as opposed to the number of seats that you can fill, or the number of seats that you have to fill,” Crow said. “We not only have to take down the walls around the university, but take every asset that we have and make it available to any learner in the society more broadly.”

Crow said ASU students are given a personalized navigation solution that tracks their academic progress and plans their individual pathway toward a degree, providing seamless journeys from college into meaningful employment. However, there are still knowledge and information gaps for parents and family members regarding academic institutions, financial aid and pathways to employment. That too needs to be addressed, he said.

“All of that comes from thinking of higher education as a scarce commodity as opposed to an abundant commodity,” Crow said. “We’re using technology as our mechanism to empower abundance.”

Crow said learners come from all walks of life and want different things for themselves, and that universities should become less one-dimensional and more practical when it comes to preparing students for careers.

“We shouldn’t care where someone starts. Do they want to go into the military? Great. Let’s help them to be able to do that,” Crow said. “Do they want to become a carpenter or electrical worker? Great, let’s make that happen. What we don’t realize is that every one of those people, whether you go to college or whether you go to work right away are going to need learning now and going forward in this phase of our economic evolution … We need a whole new logic relative to education.”

Crow’s remarks resonated with the panel, particularly Carnegie’s Srinivasan.

“I love the way he (Crow) positioned this as a design challenge and that if we are going forward, there is a need for a new logic,” Shrinivasan said. “That’s exactly what our thinking is.”

Top photo courtesy of iStock/Getty Images 

image title

All-female sport groups create space for empowerment, belonging

April 8, 2021

Empowering young women to coach and organize can create opportunities for them, their communities

Sport can be considered one of the most powerful platforms to promote strength, empowerment and inclusion. Over the last few decades, women have made waves in the movement to promote gender equality in sports, clubs and organizations. Structural changes that break gender barriers have empowered young women to create groups that make them feel heard and understood.

In fact, recent youth sport statistics show that girls are participating in sports like basketball and soccer at similar rates as boys their same age. The data also highlights similarities across genders in terms of the average age they begin playing sports and the average duration they participate in youth sports.

But as Alaina Zanin points out, when race and socioeconomics are taken into account, children of color and those living in underserved areas are significantly less likely to participate in sport, particularly for girls.

Zanin is an assistant professor in the Hugh Downs School of Human Communication and faculty affiliate in the ASU’s Global Sport Institute. Her research examines the intersection of health and organizational communication, specifically as it relates to girls’ participation in sport.

As a former collegiate track and cross-country runner, her current research on gender disparities relates to her own experiences as a young female athlete, which inspired her to make a difference in other girls' lives through research and community projects that break down barriers to participation.

Question: Why do women still feel the need to create their own groups, especially when it comes to sport?

Answer: All-female sport groups create space for empowerment and belonging. They are also a safe space for women to try on athletic identities without feeling stigmatized or marginalized in traditional sport contexts. Sometimes trying out a new activity can be scary or seem intimidating, but our research indicates that all-female sport groups provide an opportunity for women to support one another in learning a new sport. 

For example, in my study of an all-female rugby team, players joined and continued participation because of the strong social bonds they created and because they felt they were able to demonstrate athletic prowess and strength without feeling judged. In other sport contexts, they reported feeling out of place or stigmatized. 

Women in sport illustration 1

Q: How do female sports, games and clubs influence identity?

A: Female athletes’ participation in sport expands their possibilities for identity enactment. That is, when women participate in sport they can embody both athletic and feminine identities — expanding what it means to be a woman and an athlete. 

Often in athletics, female athletes feel a tension between their feminine identity and their athletic identity, because sport contexts are historically associated with identity stereotypes of masculinity. This creates a double-bind or “a rock and a hard place” for female athletes, where they believe they cannot enact athletic and feminine identities at the same time. 

However, all-female sport teams can, and often do, reject this notion that female athletes cannot be both feminine and athletic. This rejection of identity stereotypes creates new meanings for what it means to be a woman and what it means to be an athlete. 

Women in sport illustration 2

Q: Why are young women less likely to participate in sports, especially those in underserved communities and young women of color?

A: Gender disparities in sport participation are complex, particularly for women and girls who reside in underserved communities and for young women of color. There are several issues related to structural barriers including fewer sport participation opportunities in underserved communities and the rise in high-cost club sports in the U.S. without alternative options for low-cost, recreational youth sport.

There are also less tangible, communicative, identity-based reasons like girls and women not seeing themselves participating in and leading sport organizations. For example, recent survey research indicates that only 26% of youth sport coaches are female, a proportion that is greatly smaller than the national average of girls that participate in sport in the U.S. 

Women in sport illustration 3

Q: Why is health and organizational communication especially relevant to gender equality in sport?

A: Participation in sport has a host of immediate and long-term positive outcomes for girls, particularly in terms of their socioemotional development. We also know that trying out sports early increases the likelihood that girls will take on athletic identities and participate in sport through high school. This participation through high school is extremely important because it is related to a decrease in risky behaviors, like experimentation with drugs and alcohol, and also increases the likelihood that these girls will maintain a habit of exercise throughout their lives. Moreover, girls that participate in sport are more likely to be leaders later in their workplaces. Taken together this research indicates that girls’ early exposure to sport has the potential to reduce gender inequities in other contexts as well. It is just one more hammer for the glass ceiling.

Women in sport illustration 4

Q: What challenges still exist and how can we overcome them?

A: These challenges can be divided into both resource barriers and discursive barriers. Girls need resources in terms of more opportunities for low-cost sports, transportation and more female coaches. At the same time, discursive barriers in terms of gender stereotypes still exist in athletics. These are reproduced through everyday talk and through larger societal narratives associated with gender and athletic identities. 

Some of the solutions include changes to inclusivity and involvement. We can change the way we talk about women in sport, change the way that we talk to young girls and female athletes, change societal narratives that perpetuate stereotypes associated with gender and athletics, and empower girls and women to respond to stereotypes associated with female athletes.

You can also get involved by becoming a youth coach for girls in your community. Myself and two other professors at ASU will be leading an Applied Coaching Course (spring 2022) partnered with Girls on the Run (GOTR) Maricopa Co., where students will spend four weeks in the classroom learning coaching skills, and then 10 weeks leading a GOTR team as a community coach at an underserved site within the community.

If we connect women’s and youth sport organizations that have the same goals, we can maximize partnerships, resources and sport opportunities for girls and women. Empowering young women, particularly young women of color to lead, coach and organize can open opportunities for themselves and their communities. 

WATCH: Meet the Women's Skate Club at ASU

Illustrations by Alex Cabrera/ASU

Media Relations Officer , Media Relations and Strategic Communications