ASU engineers get to the heart of organs-on-a-chip


August 17, 2020

Providing meticulous care of the human heart means having an accurate cardiac model on which to conduct disease modeling, drug testing and other research.

One new way to study the heart is through the use of miniature microfluidic chips. These silicone-based rectangular pieces are about the size of a soda can tab and have tiny, specially designed channels where cells are deposited. The cells organize and grow into tissues that mimic organs at a much smaller scale. Graphic of a heart made of polygons and interconnected lines. A polygonal graphic of the human heart. Arizona State University biomedical engineering doctoral student Jaimeson “Jaime” Veldhuizen and Associate Professor Mehdi Nikkhah collaborated with an interdisciplinary research team to design and validate a new heart-on-a-chip platform for use in disease modeling, drug testing and other research. Graphic courtesy of Shutterstock Download Full Image

The tissue in the chip responds to pharmaceuticals and diseases just like a human heart would respond in the body, allowing researchers to closely observe the responses without the potential for harm.

Mehdi Nikkhah, an associate professor of biomedical engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University, and biomedical engineering doctoral student Jaimeson “Jaime” Veldhuizen took on the challenge of designing and validating a new heart-on-a-chip platform. Their innovative work was recently published in the research journal Biomaterials.

Their chip improves upon other engineered cardiac tissue platforms to provide more control and accuracy to study drug toxicity, diseases and treatments.

Advancing the heart-on-a-chip model

Nikkhah and his lab group have been very active in the development of organ and disease tissue-on-a-chip platforms, including neurovascular tissue as well as breast and brain tumors.

“Development of these tissue-on-chip models has generated a rich amount of knowledge and technical expertise in our lab in pertinent areas such as design and fabrication of the microfluidic platforms, selection of proper hydrogel biomaterials, multiculture of primary and stem cells, surface chemistry and so forth,” Nikkhah said. “This generated knowledge, expertise and toolkits have laid a solid foundation for our work in successful engineering of target tissue-on-chip models.”

Organ-on-a-chip technologies have been developed in a variety of structures and cell configurations for some time now. Developing heart patches for therapeutic use has been common, and other engineered tissues in different platforms have been used to research them.

Some investigators use a 2D sheet of tissue, but this doesn't mirror the three dimensions of a human heart. Others employ posts around which engineered tissue is wrapped — a format that is good for measuring contractions of the heart muscle.

One drawback to these types of engineered tissues and other chip platforms is they typically use only cardiomyocytes, which are the cells that make up the heart muscle. By only using one cell type, or monoculture, the studies are limited because they don’t consider other important cell types that make up the wall of the heart.

To better mimic the heart as a whole, Veldhuizen and Nikkhah created a unique design that differs from others in key ways. Their model is the first 3D microfluidic heart-on-a-chip that uses both cardiomyocyte muscle cells and fibroblast connective cells. The chip’s tissue channels also have microposts around which the tissues grow in a more organized structure.

Getting to the heart of the problem

If you look at the wall of a heart muscle through a microscope, you will see that the tissue, called the myocardium, is composed of parallel, aligned fibers that enable regular heartbeats.

Veldhuizen and Nikkhah mimic this structure on a chip platform with elliptical microposts — a unique design for organ-on-a-chip platforms.

“The importance of these posts is their ability to affect the surrounding 3D tissue, causing it to align around the posts,” Veldhuizen said. “We found that these posts can align heart tissue in a similar fashion (to natural myocardial tissue), which not only enhances the structure of the tissue, but also its function, making it a better heart-on-a-chip model.”

Another way to better represent a real heart is to use more than just muscle cells. Cardiomyocytes enable the heart muscle to beat throughout a person’s life, but they need their support structures, the fibroblast connective cells, to reliably function.

Creating these cells is a challenging task for researchers — and Veldhuizen had to do it three times with different stem cell types. In the final stage of the research, Veldhuizen used human pluripotent stem cells to create cardiomyocytes. Pluripotent stem cells are expensive and hard-to-produce, but they are very beneficial as they can turn into any type of organ cell. But turning them into the right type of organ cell is a researcher's biggest challenge.

Typically, researchers use specific stimuli or reagents to make human pluripotent stem cells “differentiate” themselves into the type of cells they want. But sometimes the stem cells spontaneously start on their journey to become something the researchers don’t want, like kidney cells. In Veldhuizen’s work, she’d sometimes see spontaneous differentiation of the stem cells, where they'd become some mixture of cells instead of the heart cells they needed to use in their model.

Even when Veldhuizen got the cardiomyocyte cells she wanted, another obstacle she encountered was their immaturity. When first differentiated, stem cells reflect tissue cells in an embryonic or fetal state, not how typical adult cells look and behave.

“The ability to mature human pluripotent stem cell cardiomyocytes is a major obstacle in the field of heart tissue modeling,” Veldhuizen said. “The differences between the fetal and the mature or adult types span cell size, shape, metabolism, gene expression, calcium handling and contractile patterns. Therefore it is important to mature these cells to model the adult human heart in a lab, and to translate any biological or pharmaceutical findings into clinical relevance.”

Veldhuizen found that by both co-culturing the muscle cells with supporting fibroblast cells among a 3D hydrogel and causing them to align with the microposts, her research team’s heart-on-a-chip model enhances the maturity level of these heart cells, so they’re more suitable for in vitro heart studies.

A multidisciplinary team tackles a complex organ

Just as the human body uses a team of specialized organs to function, complex health technology requires an interdisciplinary group of researchers to get results.

Veldhuizen and Nikkhah worked with stem cell biology expert David Brafman, an assistant professor of biomedical engineering and faculty member of the ASU-Banner Neurodegenerative Disease Research Center, as well as recent bioengineering and biomedical engineering doctoral degree graduate Joshua Cutts.

Brafman and Cutts provided guidance on the foundations of differentiating commercial stem cell lines into heart tissue, and access to a quantitative polymerase chain reaction machine in their lab, which is used for gene expression analysis.

To ensure their work is clinically relevant, the team consulted with Dr. Raymond Migrino, a cardiologist and cardiovascular biology expert from the Phoenix Veterans Affairs Health Care System and the University of Arizona.

Working together with experts in these areas allowed Veldhuizen and other members of the Nikkhah Lab to design a chip that resulted in the best functional model of a heart for a range of important uses.

A new way to study heart diseases, treatments and drug effects

Now that Veldhuizen and Nikkhah have validated the technology, it can be used as a platform to model the progression and treatment of cardiovascular diseases.

This is an important platform for testing pharmaceutical effects on the heart. Many drug discovery approaches fail in preclinical and clinical trials because the conventional assays used in earlier tests do not sufficiently mimic the human heart. As well, researchers can bypass animal models that do not accurately reflect human physiology.

By introducing drugs to tissue on the chip, researchers can observe toxicity and side effects that would negatively affect the heart. For example, chemotherapy often leads to cardiac toxicity, but no one knows why. Researchers can study this phenomenon with Veldhuizen and Nikkhah’s new platform.

In addition to drug experiments, researchers can introduce “insults” such as oxygen deprivation for a heart attack or high glucose to simulate diabetes-related heart disease as a means to study common ailments, or to discover causes of diseases that are currently unknown.

Finally, since it has been validated for use with stem cells from adult humans — the pluripotent stem cells — the platform can use a particular individual’s cells to study their own genetic diseases. In the future, the individual’s care team can safely find the most effective treatments by experimenting on the chip and not the person’s heart.

“We can study disease manifestations, mechanisms for how it progresses or different kinds of treatments,” Veldhuizen said.

Monique Clement

Communications specialist, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering

480-727-1958

 
image title

ASU study looks at humans’ exposure to future extreme temperatures

August 17, 2020

Over the next century, climate change and population growth will subject more people to dangerous heat and cold

Editor’s note:  This story is being highlighted in ASU Now’s year in review. Read more top stories from 2020.

Denver is known for its relatively mild climate and its four distinct seasons. It’s also known for its temperature fluctuations over the course of a day or even hours. But what does that mean for the city’s residents — and for that matter, the rest of the inhabitants of the continental United States when it comes to temperature extremes?

That’s what Ashley Broadbent wanted to know. Specifically, he wanted to know how populations throughout the United States will experience heat and cold during the 21st century. 

So, Broadbent, an assistant research professor in Arizona State University’s School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, used state-of-the-art modeling tools to analyze how three key variables would affect human exposure to extreme temperatures from the beginning of this century to its end.

He and his collaborator Matei Georgescu, an associate professor in the School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, concentrated on the following three key factors: climate change brought about by greenhouse gas emissions, urban development-induced impacts arising from the growth of cities, and population change in individual cities.

The paper, "The motley drivers of heat and cold exposure in 21st century U.S. cities," was published online Aug. 17 in the “Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.” It is the first study of its kind to consider population-weighted heat and cold exposure that directly and simultaneously account for greenhouse gas and urban development-induced warming.

Climate change infographic 

Graphic by Alex Davis/ASU Media Relations and Strategic Communications

To describe how these three variables would affect temperatures, and in turn populations, Broadbent, Georgescu and co-author Eric Scott Krayenhoff, assistant professor at the University of Guelph, Ontario, in Canada, used a metric they dubbed “person-hours,” to describe humans’ exposure to extreme heat and cold.

“It’s an intuitive metric,” Broadbent said. For example, when one person is exposed to one hour of an extreme temperature, that exposure equals one person-hour of exposure. Likewise, if 10 people are exposed to 10 hours of an extreme temperature, that exposure equals 100 person-hours.

“I think this definition is more representative of what people experience, which is what this study is about versus a study that simply communicates temperature changes without any human element attached to it,” Broadbent said.

Overall, the researchers found that the average annual heat exposure at the start of this century in the United States was about 5.2 billion person-hours. Assuming a worst-case scenario of peak global warming, population growth and urban development, the annual heat exposure would rise to 150 billion person-hours by the end of the century, a nearly 30-fold increase.

“The combined effect of these three drivers will substantially increase the average heat exposure across the United States, but heat exposure is not projected to increase uniformly in all cities across the U.S.,” Broadbent said. “There will be hot spots where heat exposure grows sharply.”

To that end, the researchers defined heat thresholds based on local city definitions, something previous studies have not done. Instead, prior studies have used fixed-temperature thresholds that may be inappropriate for some cities. Afterall, a 90-degree day in Phoenix feels much different than a 90-degree day in New York City, given relative humidity differences.

“It’s well-known that cities have locally defined thresholds where heat and cold cause mortality and morbidity,” Broadbent explained. “In other words, people die at different temperatures in different cities because what is extreme in one city may be normal in another.”

Importantly, areas of the United States where human exposure would increase the most is where climate change and population increase in tandem. Meanwhile, urban development has a smaller, yet not negligible effect.

According to the results of the study, the largest absolute changes in population heat exposure are projected to occur in major U.S. metropolitan regions, such as New York, Los Angeles and Atlanta.

The study also finds the largest relative changes in person-hours related to heat exposure are projected to occur in rapidly growing cities located in the Sun Belt, including Austin, Texas; Orlando, Florida; and Atlanta.

“The increase in exposure is quite large if you look at it relative to the start of the century,” Broadbent said. “Some cities across the Sun Belt, according to our projections, will have 90 times the number of person-hours of heat exposure.” For example, cities in Texas that see substantial population growth and strong greenhouse gas-induced climate warming could be markedly affected.

One way to prepare for increased heat exposure is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions on a global scale, which would reduce the number of hours people are exposed to extreme temperatures. Other options include localized infrastructure adaptation that provides buffering effects against rising temperatures such as planting trees, providing shade and cooling areas and constructing buildings using materials that absorb less heat.

Although the average temperature in the United States will be warmer in the future, the study finds that cold exposure will increase slightly compared with the start of the century, primarily because of population growth. “While there is a general decrease in the number of projected extreme cold events by the end of this century, the number of individuals exposed to extreme cold is projected to increase, as population growth means that the total number of person-hours of cold exposure will go up,” Broadbent said.

“Cold is currently more of a national health problem than heat, but our results suggest that by the end of the century heat exposure may become a larger health problem than cold exposure,” Broadbent said. However, cold exposure will not disappear completely as the climate warms. In fact, according to one of the team’s simulations, Denver is projected to have more extreme cold at the end of the century compared with the beginning, according to the study.

“That’s the interesting thing about climate change. We know the average temperature is going to increase,” said Broadbent. “But we know less about how the extremes are going to change, and often the extremes are the most important part of our daily lives.”

“There are several takeaway messages from this work, but one of the central ones concerns the future resiliency of our cities,” Georgescu said.

“The successful steps taken will require holistic thinking that embraces contributions from urban planners, engineers, social scientists and climate scientists with a long-range vision of how we want our cities to be. 

"We therefore call on cities to start asking some very foundational questions regarding the projected exposure of their constituents to future environmental change," Georgescu said. "Is the work of the urban climate modeling community being integrated into their environmental adaptation plans? If so, how, and if not, why not?”

This work was funded by the National Science Foundation.

Science writer , Media Relations and Strategic Communications