Skip to main content

Is this the end of DACA?

ASU Law professor talks about the possible outcomes of the upcoming Supreme Court DACA ruling


Angela Banks

Angela Banks, Charles J. Merriam Distinguished Professor of Law

|
June 08, 2020

In 2012, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program was established. This program provides work permits and protection from deportation to undocumented youth who came to the United States as children if they meet the DACA program requirements.

The Trump administration moved to phase out the DACA program in 2017, but the move was blocked by lower courts. Thus, the program did not end completely. Instead, current DACA recipients are able to renew their application, but no new applications to the program are accepted.

Appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States, a DACA ruling is expected in June. The justices will determine whether the current administration followed proper procedure in ending the program.

What effect will the DACA ruling have? Angela Banks, a Charles J. Merriam Distinguished Professor of Law at Arizona State University's Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, spoke to ASU Now about the possible outcomes.

Question: Could you give us some background as to why DACA is so controversial?

Answer: Interestingly, DACA is a program that has widespread public support. The reason a legal challenge was brought is because there were concerns by some that the process used to implement DACA, an executive order, was not the proper way to implement President Obama’s policy goals. DACA is a form of prosecutorial discretion, which has a long history in law enforcement. Within immigration law one form of prosecutorial discretion is deferred action, in which the government decides not to deport an otherwise deportable noncitizen. DACA outlined a specific set of guidelines that would be used to decide how the Department of Homeland Security would exercise prosecutorial discretion with deferred action.

Q: What could happen if the Supreme Court decides that the move to end DACA was lawful?

A: If the court upholds the ending of DACA, I see three potential outcomes. First, the government could immediately end DACA such that the deferred action and work permits for all individuals who currently have them would be invalid. Second, the government could end the deferred action and work permits on a specified date for all DACA recipients. Third, the government could honor the expiration dates for deferred action and work permits for current DACA recipients.

Q: If the DACA program ends, what could this mean for DACA students and employees?

A: Depending on how the program ends it would mean that at some point DACA recipients would lose their work permits, which would mean they no longer have the authorization to work in the United States. For college students, it could impact their access to in-state tuition. In the area of college tuition, we would be in a world very similar to that of pre-2012 when states had a variety of rules regarding eligibility for in-state tuition.

Q: What if the court decides the move to end DACA was unlawful? What are a few things we could see as a result?

A: If the court upholds the challenge in the DACA case we could see the administration undergo a new process to end DACA. The legal challenge claims that the process used to end DACA did not adhere to the Administrative Procedure Act. Therefore the administration could decide to utilize a new process and offer new reasons for ending the program. However, 2020 is an election year and DACA is a program that is widely supported. Therefore it is possible that the administration may decide to let the program remain until after the election.

More Law, journalism and politics

 

Adelaida Severson and Adriana Gonzalez-Chavez smiling for a photo.

When giving goes global: ASU family invests in students studying media abroad

The dream of studying abroad and making connections globally while in college is often hindered by the substantial cost of…

April 02, 2024
Person seated at a desk wearing headphones.

ASU, UMD Howard Centers partner with AP global investigations team on yearslong investigation into police use of force

The Associated Press global investigations team, the Howard Centers for Investigative Journalism at Arizona State University…

April 01, 2024
Portrait of Lydia Dawson.

ASU senior's thesis explores gender, politics and perception

For all its benefits, social media is an environment that remains rife with judgement, especially if you're a public figure, and…

March 28, 2024