Anthropology professor is skeptical about LiDAR Maya hype
New laser technology digitally removes forest canopy, but ASU professor says researchers need to do more digging on its real potential
Archaeologists are seeing the Maya culture in a whole new light thanks to an emerging technology that has identified countless new buildings that had been hidden for centuries.
It’s called LiDAR, and it digitally removes the tree canopy from aerial images of the ruins. It has exposed thousands of former homes, palaces, elevated roads, urban centers, complex irrigation systems and other signs of advanced civilization in the jungles of northern Guatemala. The 800-mile stretch that was mapped is considered one of the largest data sets ever obtained for archaeological research and a major breakthrough. ASU Now turned to Michael E. Smith, a professor of anthropology in the School of Human Evolution and Social Change, for answers.
Smith, an archaeologistSmith is the director of the Teotihuacan Research Laboratory. specializing in Teotihuacan and the Aztecs of central Mexico, says LiDAR has the potential to provide major insights, but he thinks researchers should do a little more digging and not give in to the hype just yet.
Question: In a nutshell, tell us how LiDAR technology works?
Answer: LiDAR is an abbreviation for a remote sensing technique called “light detection and ranging.” It is a method to create visual images of the Earth’s surface from the air. A device in an airplane sends pulses of laser light to the ground. The beams are reflected back to the device, and differences in how they are reflected and received can be used to create a digital three-dimensional image of the ground area.
It is a precise method, and its big advantage is that LiDAR can penetrate some kinds of forest vegetation. This is important for Maya archaeological sites, since much of the Maya region is covered with tropical forest vegetation. A normal photograph or video from a plane will show only the treetops, not the archaeological features.
Q: Do you see this as a breakthrough for archeology and your work in the field?
A: As I explain in my blog post on the new Maya LiDAR finds, the technique has the potential to lead to breakthroughs, and in some cases those advances are starting to appear. Once the results are in, it is relatively easy to make attractive-looking maps of the ground surface. But the true value of LiDAR is not just the pretty maps, but the fact that the results can be analyzed to get far more detailed and interesting results.
The trouble is that it takes a long time to get to that stage. It takes a lot of computer processing by experts, and it takes lots of staring at images on the computer screen. The reason I am skeptical about the new Maya results is that this particular study is only at the stage of the pretty maps. Once the hard work has been done, we may get better figures for the size of the Maya population, and better information on their houses and agricultural fields, things that are very time-consuming for archaeologists to reconstruct with traditional methods.
Q: In addition to discovering ancient ruins and give us insights from the past, how would this technology help us to look into our future?
A: The results of LiDAR analysis can be helpful only after the hard work is done and we have more detailed data. Here is an example: Drinking water is a problem for humans living in tropical forest environments. While it may rain often during one season, the rest of the year there may be little rain at all. The Maya area has very few rivers and lakes. How did people gather and store enough drinking water?
My ASU graduate student Adrian Chase analyzed LiDAR data for the great Maya city of Caracol. After a lot of programming and staring at the screen, he succeeded in identifying many small, household-level water ponds or reservoirs. The number and extent of these small features was not well known before his analysis. How does this help us look into the future? As people try to design methods to live in rainforest environments in the tropics, we can look at the example of how the Maya — a complex, urban society — were able to do this. While the solutions the Maya came up with may not be the precise solutions we need today, they can give us insights on the range of ways people have thrived in difficult environments in the past, and help us come up with ideas that we can use in the future.
Q: Is the hype and publicity given to the Maya LiDAR findings warranted?
A: Yes and no. Yes, in the sense that these data have tremendous potential to contribute to our knowledge of the ancient Maya. They can revise our figures for Maya populations, for their farming systems, their housing and domestic organization, and other topics. But right now, these things exist only as potential results, not as actual findings. So that is the “no” sense of my answer. Right now, with the available information, we have no greater understanding of the Maya. That will have to wait until the hard work gets done. The LiDAR data have to be ground-truthed (checked on the ground), processed by computers and analyzed carefully.
It is significant that these finds are reported by the National Geographic Society, an organization whose interest in publicity and spectacular claims often takes precedence over their interest in solid scientific results. Many public announcements of archaeological findings are based on technical articles published in peer-reviewed journals. That is a sign that there has been a real advance, sanctioned by colleagues and journal editors. The new LiDAR finds have not yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal, because they are still preliminary. Another feature of the hype that comes from an organization like National Geographic Society is that the finds are announced as if they were the first time anyone though to apply LiDAR to the Maya area. But in fact, archaeologists have used LiDAR in other parts of the Maya zone for seven or eight years now.
Top photo: Structure in the Mayan ruins. Photo courtesy of Pixabay
More Science and technology
Advances in forensic science improve accuracy of ‘time of death’ estimates
Accurate “time of death” estimates are a mainstay of murder mysteries and forensic programs, but such calculations in the real world are often complex and imprecise. In a first-of-its-kind study,…
Unpacking a plastic paradox
Demand for plastics exists in a constant paradox: thin yet strong, cheap yet sophisticated, durable yet degradable. The various traits of plastics are determined by the polymer used to make the…
New chief operations officer to help ramp up SWAP Hub advancements
Last September, the Southwest Advanced Prototyping Hub — a collaboration of more than 130 industry partners led by Arizona State University — received nearly $40 million as part of the CHIPS and…