image title

Consumer rage on the rise

Mad as hell? ASU study finds consumer rage is on the rise.
'Your call is important to us' and other rage-inducing things companies do.
November 25, 2015

Joint study by ASU finds companies risking billions with customer dissatisfaction

Your cable cuts out in the fourth quarter of the football game.

You can’t access the voice mails on your cell phone.

The “check engine” light goes on in your car a week after you had it in for service.

Are you angry yet?

If so, you're not alone.

More customers are reporting problems with goods or services and two-thirds of them have escalated to feeling “consumer rage,” according to a new study released by Arizona State University.

The 2015 Consumer Rage Survey results illustrate not only the increasing level of consumer discontent, but also the specific services that incur their wrath — and the customer-service phrases that enrage them (“Your call is important to us …”).

“The loss of time and the aggravation have been steadily coming to the fore in terms of what’s difficult for people,” said Mary Jo BitnerMary Jo BitnerMary Jo Bitner hold the Edward M. Carson Chair in Service Marketing and also is a professor of marketing., executive director of the W. P. Carey School of Business Center for Services LeadershipThe Center for Services Leadership is a research center in the W. P. Carey School of Business that combines scientific research with business best practices., which released the study.

“For companies, I don’t know why they don’t get that.”

The survey was conducted by Customer Care Measurement and Consulting and Dialog DirectCCMC is a Virginia-based company that performs customer-satisfaction surveys and Dialog Direct is a Michigan-based marketing and call center provider. in collaboration with the Center for Services Leadership. It's the seventhThe survey was conducted in August 2015 via telephone calls to a representative sample of 1,000 respondents. one since the White House started doing the survey in 1976.

The results show that even though businesses spend billions of dollars dealing with problems, such as establishing 800 numbers for customer concerns, they still aren’t getting it right.

That rage is costing businesses. The survey extrapolated the results and estimated that more than $202 billion of revenue is at risk when companies lose business because of dissatisfaction.

Among the survey’s top findings:

• Cable and satellite TV is the service that had the most problems among respondents – at 23 percent, up from 17 percent in the 2013 survey. That was followed by telephone service, both land line and cell, at 18 percent; automobiles, 11 percent; computer service (such as Internet providers), 6 percent; and retailers, 6 percent.

• Fifty-four percent of customers reported having problems – 4 percentage points more than the last survey, two years ago, and 22 percentage points more than the first survey, in 1976.

• Of the two-thirds who reported feeling consumer rage, 35 percent said that they yelled and 15 percent admitted to cursing.

• Sixty-three percent of respondents felt they got nothing as a result of complaining – an increase of 7 percentage points from two years ago. Three-quarters of complainants wanted an apology but only 28 percent got one.

• Time lost was the most common damage reported as a result of consumer problems. Sixty percent of respondents lost time compared with 43 percent who lost money.

• 63 percent called an 800 number while 48 percent went to a local office or store. Twenty-one percent didn’t complain.

Bitner said the results on cable TV, telephones and cars aren’t surprising because those are complicated services and products that often require more than a quick fix.

“They’re really important to us and we don’t have that sophisticated understanding, ourselves. And it can take the companies awhile to figure out and fix the problems,” she said.

The message of this survey to merchants is that it takes more than money to resolve these issues. Thirty-seven percent of complainants who got a monetary remedy — repairs or service fixed, money back, a free product in the future or compensation for damages — were satisfied.

But when consumers got both a monetary and non-monetary remedy, 73 percent were happy. Non-monetary remedies include receiving an apology, being treated with dignity, having an agent who didn’t use a scripted response, being assured that the problem would not be repeated, getting an explanation or a thank you for patronage and being allowed to vent.

“The thing you can take away is that companies could be doing some really important things to solve the customer-service problems — and some of them don’t cost very much money,” Bitner said.

“Companies have the right intentions and they put the right words behind things but oftentimes the execution is not necessarily done well, such as bouncing people around, making customers repeat themselves to another person and another person,” she said.

Bitner said that one example of a company doing it right is Zappos, the Las Vegas-based online clothing and shoe retailer. With more than 90 percent of its customer interactions occurring online, the company sees a complaint as an opportunity to prove itself, she said.

“They don’t have limits on the time that a person can spend on the phone with a customer,” she said. “That’s an issue because often companies have incentives for people to get off the phone as fast as they can.

“Zappos tells (employees) to own the problem, own the issue and to solve it.”

Bitner said that Zappos, which removes artificial barriers to customer satisfaction like time limits and quotas, is an extreme example.

“But we don’t want the survey to paint with a big broad brush that companies aren’t doing anything good.”

The survey noted the increase of complaining on social media, with 30 percent of respondents saying they posted their irritations to an online site, compared with 19 percent two years ago.

Bitner said that she's seeing more companies monitoring social media websites.

"When they hear or see a complaint, smart companies are doing something about that before it turns into a bigger thing.

"Companies have to go above and beyond."

Mary Beth Faller

Reporter , ASU News


ASU engineers working to protect nation’s energy-delivery systems from cyberattacks

November 25, 2015

Arizona State University has been named a partner in a $28.1 million national research program to develop cybersecurity tools and standards to protect the country’s electricity infrastructure from attacks.

The University of Illinois is leading the program, called the Cyber Resilient Energy Delivery Consortium (CREDC). It will work with 11 other universities and national laboratories to focus on improving the cyber resiliency of energy-delivery systems. portraits of ASU engineers Anna Scaglione and Gail-Joon Ahn Left: Anna Scaglione, professor of electrical, computer and energy engineering. Right: Gail-Joon Ahn, Fulton Entrepreneurial Professor of computing, informatics and decision systems engineering and director of the Global Security Initiative’s Center for Cybersecurity and Digital Forensics. Download Full Image

The Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering is leading ASU’s effort, under the leadership of Anna Scaglione, professor of electrical, computer and energy engineering, and Gail-Joon Ahn, Fulton Entrepreneurial Professor of computing, informatics and decision systems engineering and director of ASU’s Global Security Initiative’s Center for Cybersecurity and Digital Forensics.

Funding for the ASU’s part of the project is $1.2 million.

The consortium will undertake research, development, education and outreach activities — with intense industry engagement — to develop solutions. The consortium model explicitly creates a pipeline that generates research results and takes them through to evaluation and deployment of prototypes in industrial settings, with a handoff to the energy sector through licensing, start-ups and open-source mechanisms.

Energy-delivery systems are critical infrastructures and, due to their wide area footprint, rely on complex industrial control networks and enterprise networks to ensure reliability in their day-to-day operations and for their management.

“The computer network technologies used expose these systems to cyberattacks similar to those impacting financial institutions, government and many other enterprises,” Scaglione said. “In addition to the breach of  confidential information and possible economic losses, attacks to energy-delivery systems can potentially activate malicious automation equipment with dire consequences, since they can damage physical instrumentation and, at a larger scale, lead to outages which have great socio-economic impact.”

“Our stake in this initiative is to focus on securing several new technologies that are emerging,” Ahn said. “We will study the coupling that exists between energy-delivery systems and other infrastructures, including building and home automation infrastructures and the so-called Internet of Things, which can make the end use of electricity responsive to grid congestion, but may also be vulnerable to cyberattacks aimed at creating imbalance in the grid.”

ASU researchers also will study how future energy-delivery systems can leverage the trends toward cloud computing and cloud storage without opening the door to new cybersecurity threats.

“Cybersecurity is one of the most serious challenges facing grid modernization, which is why maintaining a robust, ever-growing pipeline of cutting-edge technologies is essential to helping the energy sector continue adapting to the evolving landscape,” said Patricia Hoffman, assistant secretary for the Department of Energy’s Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability. “To meet this challenge, we must continue investing in innovative, next-generation technologies that can be transitioned to the energy sector to reduce the risk of a power disruption resulting from a cyber incident.” 

Sharon Keeler