Implications of free speech topic of ASU California event

Cronkite School dean, media scholars, First Amendment attorneys say it can be a tight line to walk


Exterior of the ASU California Center building in Los Angeles.
|

Ever wonder if what you say, write or communicate online or in any public forum is still protected by the First Amendment?

These days it can be a tight line to walk, according to an esteemed panel of media scholars and First Amendment attorneys who discussed how we might protect free expression while also protecting our society from the misuse of that freedom during a Feb. 24 live Q&A session from the ASU California Center.

Hosted by Zócalo Public Square in partnership with the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication, "Does The First Amendment Still Protect Free Speech?" was moderated by Los Angeles Times editorial writer Carla Hall. The panel included legal scholars Jody David Armour of the University of Southern California; Eugene Volokh of the University of California, Los Angeles; media and First Amendment attorney Jean-Paul Jassy; and Cronkite School Dean Battinto L. Batts Jr.

Conversations spanned from cancel culture and Citizens United and their impacts on freedom of speech to the rights and protections of telecommunications and big tech corporations’ under the First Amendment. Panelists agreed that while the speed and modes in which we communicate today have rapidly evolved, media corporations have always been protected. 

Batts acknowledged journalism’s pivotal role in democracy and how the Cronkite School embeds objective reporting into all courses. However, he also said that the industry’s model continues to morph. 

“Journalism has evolved, and it continues to evolve. The model that we’ve known for such a long time is being objective, covering both sides in fairness. That model still exists, but there is an advocacy journalism model that has emerged that is also very much part of a healthy process,” he said.

Other hot topics on the table were fake news and democracy, cultural revolutions and social movements like Black Lives Matter and #MeToo. 

Armour, the Roy P. Crocker Professor of Law at USC, who is an avid free speech defender and an expert in teaching cases involving racial profiling and police, and excessive force issues, said that without the First Amendment, such movements may have never come to fruition. 

“I know there would not be a Black Lives movement without freedom of speech,” he said. “You have the movement of our generation and it was made possible by robust protection of First Amendment rights.” 

So what about muting voices? Can media corporations like Spotify and Nexflix legally cancel Joe Rogan and Dave Chapelle merely because they don’t like or agree with their content? What about big tech companies like Twitter banning President Trump, and most recently, Meta banning Kanye West for allegedly bullying his former wife Kim Kardashian? 

In short, the answer is "yes." In the case of media corporations, the panelists confirmed media and tech powerhouses are indeed protected by the First Amendment to publish or not publish the content they like as privately-owned companies, but in the cases above, it is more of a free market issue than one of free speech. 

“These are difficult questions, and they’re not purely legal ones,” Jassy said. 

Volokh, a professor at UCLA, asked viewers another tough follow-up question for consideration: “Do you want to be in a position where economically powerful companies decide you are out of bounds, whether it be because we don’t like you or because enough people don’t like you?” 

Batts also reminded viewers that free speech and the First Amendment continue to be the underpinnings of this country, and that while not always easy, free speech rights are worth protecting for civil liberties and discourse. 

“This thing we call democracy – that we pine for – we have to remember is not a pretty process,” he said. “It’s not a fine dining experience; it’s a food fight, and it should be.”

Top photo: Exterior of the ASU California Center in Los Angeles.

More Law, journalism and politics

 

Portrait of professor sitting at desk with blue lighting

Exploring the intersection of law and technology

Editor's note: This expert Q&A is part of our “AI is everywhere ... now what?” special project exploring the potential (and potential pitfalls) of artificial intelligence in our lives. Explore…

A maroon trolly car floating on a flat ASU gold background

The ethical costs of advances in AI

Editor's note: This feature article is part of our “AI is everywhere ... now what?” special project exploring the potential (and potential pitfalls) of artificial intelligence in our lives. Explore…

Law students sit outside the Beus Center for Law and Society at Arizona State University.

ASU Law students earn record number of judicial clerkships

Students who graduate from the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University are used to making an impact. Now, they’re breaking records.  According to data from the American…